My best victory yet was a 3v3 where I managed to penetrate their outer defenses whilst my other 2 teammates where engaged in a 2v3 (I knew we wouldn't win in a 3v3 against all their static defenses in addition to their armies) and just rushed theirs down with fire lancers.
If anything that just proves the point that it isn't balanced. I won a 1v2 with the wonder a couple times as well. But in team games it's just not really balanced, almost every time the one who builds their wonder first wins. If it's a 1v1 then fair enough, I don't even think it's a viable strategy then anyway. Idk why there isn't a separate queue for conquest only already. No wonder popular YouTuber 2kliksphilip dubbed AoE II as "the game that keeps on giving.Until it's removable in options I hold off doing it as a courtesy. While this certainly can't have helped its case, one would have expected a similar pattern of renewal for the first and third games, even though neither entry can touch The Age of Kings when it comes to active players. It's tempting to argue that the second game's success stems from continued remakes and remasters, that an HD edition followed by a definitive edition have helped to keep the game fresh and ever-present within the RTS market. In comparison, Age of Empires III's Definitive Edition hasn't made it above 10,000 since October 2020.
From November 2019 to August 2022, the Definitive Edition of AoE II has not once dropped below 20,000 players at peak, occasionally breaking the 30,000 barrier but never dipping under that respectable threshold.
Considering that its numbers are by no means disgraceful, it may be more beneficial to look not at where AoE IV is defective and instead consider just how AoE II has achieved such longevity.
0 kommentar(er)
